CBI

CBI suspects bigger conspiracy in Kolkata rape-murder case, former principal and inspector in custody

by
Kolkata rape-murder case, Sandip Ghosh,CBI ,RG Kar Medical College,

The CBI’s recent arrests of a former principal and a police officer shed light on a potential larger conspiracy in the Kolkata rape-murder case. Sandip Ghosh and Abhijit Mondol’s alleged roles in the crime have raised questions about attempts to shield perpetrators and manipulate the investigation. Read also :Who Will Be Delhi’s New CM? Decision Today: Six Names in the Race, Leader to Be Chosen in 11:30 AM Meeting In a shocking turn of events, former principal of RG Kar Medical College, Sandip Ghosh, and Tala police station officer-in-charge, Abhijit Mondol, were arrested in connection with the heinous rape and murder case of a junior doctor in Kolkata. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) suspects a larger conspiracy at play in this tragic incident, involving Ghosh and Mondol. The court in Sealdah has remanded both individuals in CBI custody until September 17, as the investigation unfolds. According to CBI claims presented in court, Ghosh and Mondol allegedly played crucial roles in the crime and were in communication with each other. It is alleged that Ghosh even provided instructions to Mondol on how to handle the case, pointing to a disturbing level of coordination. Seeking a three-day custody to conduct face-to-face interrogations, the CBI has accused the pair of attempting to minimize the severity of the crime and shield the culprits involved. Mondol, in particular, faces a slew of charges including disturbing the crime scene, tampering with evidence, violating protocols, criminal conspiracy, and misleading investigators. His actions, such as delaying the filing of an FIR and hastening the victim’s cremation, have come under intense scrutiny. Read also :Vishwakarma Puja 2024: Exact Time and Rituals to Perform,History, Significance, Key Facts, and Famous Quotes The victim’s family has raised serious concerns about the conduct of the Kolkata Police, alleging that they tried to suppress the case by hastily cremating the body and even offering bribes to deter them from seeking justice. On the other hand, the manager of the crematorium has refuted these claims, suggesting that the body may have decomposed due to delays between the autopsy and its arrival for cremation. The case continues to unravel, shedding light on potential systematic failures and deliberate attempts to obstruct justice. As investigations progress, more details are expected to emerge, painting a clearer picture of the tragic events that transpired. Read also :Budhwa Mangal 2024: Why and How to Celebrate This Sacred Day for Lord Hanuman

Election Commission accuses CBI of trying to disrupt elections by giving notice to Mahua Moitra

by

The Election Commission has accused the CBI of attempting to disrupt elections by issuing a notice to Mahua Moitra, the former Trinamool Congress MP. Amid allegations of illegal activities and political interference, Moitra has filed a complaint with the Election Commission, calling for control over Central Investigative Agencies ahead of the upcoming elections. In recent news, former Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra has raised serious concerns about the actions of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in relation to its election campaign in Delhi. According to her, the CBI is resorting to illegal activities to impede her campaign efforts. Mahua Moitra has taken her complaint to the Election Commission, alleging that the CBI is manipulating the situation under the guise of conducting investigations for political gains. She believes that it is crucial to regulate Central Investigative Agencies to prevent any unwarranted interference, especially with the upcoming elections on the horizon. The CBI recently carried out raids in Kolkata and Krishnanagar, specifically targeting Mahua Moitra and her father over suspected financial irregularities. This move has sparked further controversy and fueled Moitra’s claims of foul play. It’s worth noting that Mahua Moitra’s political journey has been marred by allegations. She was previously removed from her MP position by the Election Commission due to accusations of purchasing votes from businessman Darshan Hirandani. The decision by the Lok Sabha Ethics Committee was rooted in claims that Moitra had bought cows from Hirandani. Despite these setbacks, Mahua Moitra found herself back in the political arena after being reappointed by the Trinamool Congress in the Krishna Nagar Mandal in Bengal, where she had previously emerged victorious. The Election Commission has also thrown its weight behind Moitra, accusing the CBI of attempting to disrupt the electoral process by serving her with a notice. The unfolding events paint a picture of intense political drama and underscore the high stakes involved as the election season heats up.

Supreme Court Denies Bail to Manish Sisodia in Delhi Excise Policy Case

by

The Supreme Court has denied bail to Manish Sisodia, former Delhi deputy chief minister, in a case related to an alleged excise policy scam. Sisodia has been in custody since February 26 and the court directed that the trial procedure be concluded within six to eight months. If the trial proceeds slowly, Sisodia can re-apply for bail at a later stage. The court also emphasized the need to uphold protection granted under the law and stated that the case cannot proceed based on assumptions. New Delhi :Former Delhi deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia’s bail pleas have been rejected by the Supreme Court in a case related to an alleged excise policy scam. Sisodia has been in custody since his arrest by the CBI on February 26 for his alleged involvement in the scam. The bail pleas were heard by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and SVN Bhatti, who directed that the trial procedure in the case be concluded within six to eight months. The court stated that if the trial proceeds slowly, Sisodia can re-apply for bail at a later stage. One interesting point mentioned by the court is that the bribe allegedly paid for tweaking the excise policy may not be part of the predicate offense, making it difficult to prove the money-laundering case against Sisodia. The court emphasized the need to uphold any protection granted under the law and stated that the case cannot proceed based on assumptions. This is not the first time Sisodia has been denied bail. The high court previously rejected his bail plea, deeming the charges against him to be serious in nature. The Supreme Court had also rejected his bail plea on May 30, citing his high-profile status and potential influence on witnesses. The trial procedure in the case is expected to be concluded within the next six to eight months. If the trial proceeds slowly, Sisodia will have the opportunity to re-apply for bail. The court did not delve into the legal questions of the case, leaving room for further discussion in the future.