India’s push for reform of the United Nations Security Council gains momentum as it calls out China’s disguised vetoes in sanctions committees. The lack of accountability and inclusivity in the Council’s working methods have drawn criticism, with India leading the charge for a more representative and effective global governance structure. Find out how India’s advocacy for reform aligns with evolving international relations and the need for a revitalized Security Council to tackle contemporary challenges comprehensively.
India has been vocal in its criticism of China’s use of “holds” in the UN Security Council (UNSC) sanctions committees, referring to them as disguised vetoes. India’s representative at the UN has pointed out the lack of accountability in the Security Council’s working methods, highlighting China’s frequent blocking of proposals to designate Pakistan-based terrorists. This behavior allows China to avoid taking responsibility for addressing terrorism effectively.
In response to these challenges, India has been advocating for reform within the Security Council to ensure it can effectively address global issues. India has emphasized the success of consensus-building outside the Security Council, as seen in forums like the G20 summit. India has also taken the lead in proposing to make the African Union a permanent member of the G20, aiming to bring more diverse voices to the table.
India, along with the G4 nations, has put forth proposals to expand the Security Council’s membership to enhance its effectiveness and legitimacy. India’s aspiration for a permanent seat at the UN reflects the evolving dynamics of international relations and the need for a more representative Council structure to promote multilateral cooperation.
The opaque and unaccountable decision-making processes in the Security Council, particularly highlighted by China’s repeated use of veto power, undermine the Council’s effectiveness and legitimacy. There is a clear call for meaningful reform to revitalize the Council’s ability to tackle modern global challenges.
The current structure of the Security Council, shaped by Cold War dynamics, no longer aligns with the realities of the 21st century. This outdated framework impedes the Council’s ability to find consensus-driven solutions. Addressing issues related to veto power held by permanent members is crucial to rebalancing power dynamics within the Council.
Efforts to include the African Union as a permanent member of the G20 underscore the significance of broader representation in global decision-making forums. India’s stance on the need for a more inclusive Security Council membership reflects the growing consensus on the necessity of adapting global governance structures to address contemporary challenges comprehensively.